Here's a story I wrote that was published in the July 2009 edition of Publishers' Auxiliary. To get this particular edition of Publishers' Auxiliary, contact: National Newspaper Association, P.O. Box 7540, Columbia, Mo. 65205-7540. Or call Publishers' Auxiliary at 1-800-829-4662, and press the prompt for the Columbia, Mo., office of NNA. One other way to access the story is to click on the boldface headline above. See pp. 27-28 of the PDF version of Publishers' Auxiliary.The picture with this blog post accompanied Dudley Brown's Herald-Journal story about the Miracle Hill Rescue Mission and Dr. Charles Hanna.By Larry Timbs
Special to Publishers’ AuxiliaryWas one graph of a recent news feature story in a South Carolina daily newspaper pandering to the kind of "lurid curiosity" that the
SPJ Code of Ethics warns journalists to avoid?
Or was it in line with the same Code’s directive that journalists commit themselves to serving the public with "thoroughness and honesty"?
Some readers in Spartanburg, S.C., are grappling with those and similar questions after their hometown newspaper, the New York Times-owned 50,000-circulation
Herald-Journal ran a story about local dentist Charles Hanna.
Written by Herald-Journal reporter Dudley Brown, the story noted that Hanna and some other area health care professionals offer free medical services on the first Saturday of each month.
Anyone showing up at the medical clinic at the Miracle Hill Rescue Mission, according to Brown’s story, is treated free of charge, whether they need a tooth pulled or filled, or whether they need treatment for such conditions as high blood pressure, diabetes, athlete’s foot and emphysema.
Brown quoted several people in his piece, including an official of the Miracle Hill Rescue Mission who praised Hanna and the other medical professionals for rendering a "great value" for the mission. He also quoted a construction worker who had stayed at the shelter and who noted he came there to get a tooth pulled because he lacked medical or dental insurance.
Another person Brown quoted was the mother of a 13-year-old child, who, like the construction worker, lacked medical insurance. She noted that if she’d gone to another dentist, she would have paid $60 for each of the three teeth she needed extracted. The $7-an-hour worker called what Hanna had done for her at the free clinic "a wonderful thing."
And Brown didn’t miss touching base with Hanna himself. In Brown’s story is this quote from the good Samaritan dentist who has volunteered at the clinic the first Saturday of each month for 10 years: "My father always told me never make anyone feel like they can’t afford it. There are a lot of people who fall through the cracks."
So far, so good.
This is a feel-good, uplifting story about a dentist and other local health care professionals who help anyone, no questions asked and no payment needed, with afflictions ranging from hurting teeth and infected gums to urinary tract infections, emphysema and hepatitis.
People out of work or under-employed or otherwise hurting come to the Miracle Hill Rescue Mission the first Saturday of each month and they get some relief from their aches and pains–for absolutely no payment.
It’s all there in Brown’s June 7, 2009, story.
But what’s also there, about midway in the story, are these kicker graphs:
Hanna’s license was suspended after he was convicted of Medicaid fraud in 1997. The state also suspended his license in the 1980s after he pleaded guilty to prescribing a painkiller to women in return for them posing for nude photographs.
"That’s been dead for a long time," Hanna said of the suspensions.So much for smiling readers ready to give Brown his due for reporting positive news about a humanitarian dentist.
Now some readers were shocked, angry, stunned; to them, such an indiscretion by the good-deed working Hanna was old, pointless news with no place in a story about how he selflessly helps down and outers.
The Herald-Journal’s online forum reflected that reader outrage.
One reader, "kennedydavid," posted this comment: "Why is it necessary to write a great article about how volunteering can benefit everyone and finish the last few lines with old news that is not even relevant(?). Guess it’s just the only way reporters know how to write. Pitiful!"
Likewise, another disappointed reader, "justdandy," complained: "Pointless. I guess Dudley is trying to stay "edgy." Where’s the editor?"
"I agree with you kennedydavid!" another person, "pinkpanther," wrote. "It is a shame that the reporters are known for their dragging old issues up to cloudy a good thing for a smear campaign. They need to be sued a couple of times to teach them a lesson."
A reader self-identified as "janewatkins09" on the Herald-Journal’s online forum for comments chimed in: "I agree with the previous posts. Dudley Brown’s comments about Dr. Hanna’s past issues are completely unnecessary in this otherwise uplifting article. Making comments like that are pure sensationalism. Thank you to all the volunteers mentioned in this article. You are greatly appreciated."
However, not all the comments on the Herald-Journal’s online reader forum, took Brown or the newspaper to task.
"Ms. Informed" wrote: "So the writer was supposed to paint this guy as a saint? Then he’d be accused of a cover up artist by people who were affected by or remember these incidents. The writer obviously had the guts to ask the dentist about it and let the dentist respond."
About the idea that the newspaper ought to be sued for mentioning the negative information about Dr. Hanna, "Ms. Informed" noted: "That would be a fun lawsuit. "Your honor, I’m suing because this reporter wrote some facts about me."
Reporter Brown learned about the homeless shelter medical mission via a phone call from a woman who told him her dad, a dentist, had volunteered his services there for the past 10 years. But, as a young staffer in the Herald-Journal’s newsroom for only a few years, how did Brown discover the dentist’s past misdeeds?
Chalk it up to research and some sharp editing.
"I skimmed through our archives going back to 1998 and all I saw was wedding announcements for his (Hanna’s) kids," Brown wrote in an email. "Another editor went back to 1997 and saw the dentist was convicted of Medicaid fraud and in the 1980s he pleaded guilty to prescribing painkillers to women who posed nude for him. The editor-in-chief, city editor and an assistant city editor felt that information should be included in the story."
There’s no question that the dated but factual information about Dr. Hanna should have been included in Brown’s story, according to Michael Smith, executive editor of the Herald-Journal. Readers would not have been well served had it not been in Brown’s piece, Smith said.
"We thought the information in question was relevant to the story," Smith responded via email. "It was a story about this dentist providing dental services to the homeless. As a dentist, his license had been suspended twice. That’s relevant in any story about him providing professional dental services.
"Some of our readers thought the information tainted an otherwise positive story," Smith added. "It is our job to tell the full story, not just the positive side. Some comments said he was doing a wonderful thing by providing these services, and it showed his good character, but including the information about the suspensions ruined that. If it was a story about his character, then certainly the suspensions are relevant.
"In short, we strive to provide the entire story. Whether our readers focus on his professional services or his character, if we had left out his license suspensions, we would have failed to tell the whole story."
Dudley Brown’s story can be accessed at:
http://www.goupstate.com/article/20090607/ARTICLES/906071035/1112?Title=Patients-line-up-for-free-care-at-rescue-mission-clinicLarry Timbs is an associate professor of mass communication at Winthrop University in Rock Hill, S.C., where he’s also faculty adviser to the student weekly newspaper and adviser to the Winthrop chapter of SPJ.
